Skip to main content
European Commission logo
Innovation Centre for Industrial Transformation and Emissions

ENERGIRON technology: DRI-EAF production route using natural gas or H2

The DRI-EAF route consists in the direct reduction of iron ore in shaft furnaces followed by melting of the Direct reduced Iron (DRI, cold or hot) or hot briquetted iron (HBI) in electric arc furnaces. The ENERGIRON technology which is using a vertical shaft furnace to reduce iron ore pellets into DRI, has been developed by Tenova and Danieli, and constitute one of the main technologies available worldwide for DRI production.

TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION
The so-called ZR (Zero Reformer) process is the most advanced version of the ENERGIRON technology which enables the reduction of iron ore pellets / lump ores (or mixtures of both) in a shaft furnace without the need for an external gas reforming equipment. In this process, reducing gases are generated in situ inside the reduction reactor. Several options are available for generating the reducing gases depending on local conditions, including:

• Direct in situ reforming of natural gas, in this case, natural gas is fed directly as make-up gas through the reducing gas circuit;
• Using an external natural gas / steam reformer;
• Using syngas obtained from gasification of fossil fuels / biomass;
• Using coke oven gas;
• Using hydrogen.

Inside the shaft furnace, the hot reducing gas is fed to the reduction zone and flows upward counter-current to the iron ore moving bed. The exhaust reducing top gas leaves the reactor at about 400 °C and passes through a heat recuperator, where its energy is recovered to produce steam or to preheat the reducing gas stream. The water produced during the reduction process is condensed and removed from the gas stream. The scrubbed gas is passed through a process gas compressor where its pressure is increased.
After the compressor, the gas is sent to a CO2 removal system which constitutes a unique feature of the ENERGIRON process. It consists of an amine absorption system combined with a stripper. Overall, the CO2 removal system leads to the sequestration of about 256 kg CO2 / t DRI, which can be sold and used as by-products by different off-takers (e.g. food and beverage industry, dry ice, enhanced oil recovery).

DEGREE OF MATURITY

Natural gas-based direct reduction:
Direct reduction plants operating with natural gas are fully commercially available and widely deployed with many installations around the world. DRI plants using the ENERGIRON process in operation worldwide have a total DRI production of 15.6 Mt in 2024.

H2-based direct reduction:
The technology readiness level is 7/8 for the use of 100% H2 in direct reduction plants, but this is expected to rise to TRL 9 in the period 2026 / 2030 when full-scale hydrogen integration projects will materialise.

Energiron plants already use large amounts of hydrogen in gas entering the shaft furnace (i.e. 70% H2 Content) and as such can accommodate additional hydrogen produced from electrolysers without process modifications.

Successful tests were carried out already during the 1990’s by Tenova at a DRI pilot plant with a production capacity of 36 tons of DRI / day situated in Mexico (Hylsa, Monterrey) with > 90% H2 (vol.). This study gathered data for design and operation under such operating conditions that are directly applicable to any existing and/or new ENERGIRON direct reduction plant. These tests also showed that using 70% H2 as energy input (about 88 % at the inlet of the furnace), the expected carbon content in the DRI was about 1.8 %.

CROSS-MEDIA EFFECTS
The electric power consumption in EAF steelmaking increases when increasing amounts of DRI are used in the furnace (in substitution for steel scrap). Typically, every increase of 10 % in DRI leads to an increase in electric power consumption of about 14.5 kWh/ton of liquid steel .
Adequate process safety management shall be implemented from the design to the operation of DRI plants both using natural gas as well as high proportions of H2.

BARRIERS TO IMPLEMENTATION
Key challenges to overcome include the availability and cost of green hydrogen, infrastructure development and the integration with existing steelmaking facilities.

Basic information about the technique

Reference documents related to the innovative technique

energiron-incite-12022026.pdf
(183,58 KB - pdf)
Download

Participant Companies

Technology provider

  • Tenova
  • Danieli
Operational
Achieved TRL 8
Environmental purpose of the innovative technique
Decarbonisation
Energy efficiency
Reduction of emissions to air (including noise and odour)
Relevant industrial sector
Iron and Steel
IED activity
2.2 Production of pig iron or steel (primary or secondary fusion) exceeding 2,5 tonnes per hour

Locations

TENOVA

Via Gerenzano 58, Castellanza 21053 Italy

DANIELI

Via Nazionale 41, Buttrio 33042 Italy

Environmental benefits

As compared to: Conventional production of pig iron using the blast furnace route.

GHG Emission

For an ENERGIRON ZR plant using natural gas to produce DRI with a carbon content of 3.7% combined with an EAF, CO2 emissions of 1082 kg CO2 / tonnes liquid steel (cold DRI) and 984 kg CO2 / tonnes liquid steel (hot DRI) have been reported. Overall, an ENERGIRON direct reduction plant combined with an EAF can lead to CO2 emissions reduction of 53% when using natural gas and 86% when using 100% H2 compared to the BF/BOF route

Energy efficiency

Based on calculated data, the total energy consumption of an ENERGIRON direct reduction plant is about 10 GJ/t DRI using natural gas and can be reduced to about 8.3 GJ/tDRI using 73% H2 (% of energy input), which is close to operating the furnace at about 90% H2. The electricity consumption is typically about 73 kWh / t DRI when using natural gas and may be reduced to about 60 kWh / t DRI when using 73% H2 (% of energy input).

Emission of Pollutants to Air

In an ENERGIRON plant, NOx emissions can be controlled using ultra-low NOx burners or even SCR which can be installed in existing convective sections of the heater or reformer. Typical NOx emissions of an ENERGIRON plant using low NOx burners are withing the range 50 - 80 mg/Nm3, while using SCR emissions can be lowered within the range 10 to 50 mg / Nm3. In an ENERGIRON plant, CO emissions are typically within the range 20 – 100 mg / Nm3, while dust emissions from the heater /reformer stack are within the range 1 -5 mg / Nm3. In an ENERGIRON plant, the CO2 absorption system also captures the sulphur, if present in the process gas stream, reducing the overall SO2 emission from the plant by about 99%.

Economics

CAPEX, OPEX and payback period data for ENERGIRON plants is highly variable depending on regions as well as specific plant configurations.