Skip to main content
European Commission logo
Innovation Centre for Industrial Transformation and Emissions

Selective Chemically Induced Denitrification (SCID)

SCID is an innovative gas-phase denitrification technique for reducing nitrogen oxides (NOₓ) and/or ammonia (NH₃) emissions in industrial combustion processes. It enables effective NOₓ removal at mid-range temperatures without the use of solid catalysts and can be integrated directly into existing flue-gas systems of installations such as cement kilns, waste-to-energy plants, and biomass combustion units.

SCID is based on a gas-phase chemical denitrification mechanism that combines key elements of selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) through the chemical activation of ammonia. The process operates typically within 600–780 °C and relies on the in-situ formation of a gas-phase catalyst (GPC) by co-injecting ammonia with a plant-specific eqinox additive. The additive used is an application-specific mixture of organic nitrogen and oxygen compounds. No aromatic compounds are used. The additive is ash-free and decomposes into nitrogen, carbon dioxide, and water when used.
Under the site-specific thermal and flow conditions, the additive decomposes to form reactive radicals that activate ammonia via hydrogen abstraction, producing NH₂ radicals. These selectively react with NOₓ to form N₂ and H₂O. Unlike conventional SNCR, which depends on thermal activation at 800–1100 °C, SCID achieves activation chemically, enabling effective NOₓ reduction outside a strict reaction window and allowing more flexible integration.

The GPC is self-sustaining and decomposes into environmentally benign species, leaving no catalyst residues. SCID also utilizes residual ammonia already present in the flue gas, thereby reducing ammonia slip and improving overall depollution performance. The technology operates entirely within the existing flue-gas path and does not require structural modification of the primary process or the use of solid catalysts.

DEMONSTRATION
A full-scale demonstration with a mobile SCID installation on a cement kiln confirmed significantly improved performance compared to the existing SNCR system:

- NOₓ-reduction performance doubled relative to the baseline SNCR configuration.

- 25 % higher NOₓ-reduction performance combined with 37.6 % lower ammonia consumption than SNCR configuration.

CONCLUSIONS
A key conclusion from the full-scale mobile testing on the cement installation is that SCID delivers a substantially higher denitrification performance at a significantly lower reaction temperature, confirming the superior effectiveness of chemically induced activation relative to the thermally driven SNCR mechanism. In addition, SCID demonstrated a markedly improved reagent efficiency.

These results demonstrate the potential for major improvements in depollution performance and reagent efficiency. SCID is expected to show similar benefits in other combustion-based sectors, with further validation planned through upcoming pilot installations.

OUTLOOK
An important aspect for upcoming pilot installations is SCID’s ability to manage process-generated ammonia, aside of NOₓ-reduction agents present in the flue gas. Many industrial combustion systems produce ammonia as a by-product. SCID can either:

(i) degrade this ammonia without affecting NOₓ abatement, preventing ammonia slip and maintaining performance of other systems; or
(ii) use it as a reactant to support NOₓ reduction, optimizing the use of internal resources.

The dominant mode will depend on flue-gas composition and plant configuration, and pilot tests will assess both scenarios.

Basic information about the technique

Reference documents related to the innovative technique

scid_onepage_en_2025.pdf
(102,35 KB - pdf)
Download

Production data

The SCID evaluation was conducted using a mobile unit connected to a full-scale operational cement kiln. Future pilot installations will generate permanent long-term production-coupled environmental datasets. The flue gas flow at the application zone at the time of testing was approx. 125,000 Nm³/h (dry).

Associated main production process(es) and product(s): Combustion Processes e.g. biomass to energy production, cement production, waste to energy production etc.

Cross media effects

Use of hazardous substances

Participant Companies

Project partners

  • DSG DeNOx Systems GmbH
  • Bussetti & Co GmbH ()

Technology provider

  • DyCarnica Karin Koglbauer MA
Under development / testing
Achieved TRL 7
Environmental purpose of the innovative technique
Energy efficiency
Material efficiency (Reduction of raw material consumption or waste generation)
Circular economy (e.g. recovery/reuse/recycling of residues, industrial symbiosis)
Reduction of emissions to air (including noise and odour)
Relevant industrial sector
Cement, lime, magnesium oxide production
Large combustion plants
Waste incineration

Locations

DyCarnica Karin Koglbauer

Austria

Environmental benefits

As compared to: Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (SNCR) and Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) are the relevant alternative techniques, as they are widely implemented, commercially available, legally accepted, and provide the current BAT performance for NOₓ abatement.

Legend

  • Expected data (on project completion)
  • Estimated data (not measured)
  • Monitored data in pilot scale installation
  • Monitored data in full scale installation

Emission of Pollutants to Air

NOx

Measured pollutant emissions
Total pollutant emissions (mg/Nm3)
  • 2024
    300 Avg
    0 300

Measured data in full-scale installation (mobile SCID unit): The NOₓ limit value was reduced by 50 %, representing up to a 100 % increase in NOₓ-reduction performance compared to SNCR. Emission performance will be validated under stable conditions in upcoming pilot installations.

Material efficiency

Raw material

Type of raw material: DeNOx reaction agent: NH3

Specific raw material consumption reference: The reference raw-material consumption corresponds to the reagent demand of the existing SNCR system under baseline operating conditions. In this configuration, ammonia usage increases disproportionately when the system operates outside its optimal thermal window, resulting in elevated reagent consumption per unit of NOₓ removed. This baseline consumption pattern will serve as the reference for assessing the specific raw-material use of SCID during the planned pilot installations.

Material consumption reduction (%)
  • 2024
    37.60 % Avg
    0 % 100 %
  • 2027
    60 % Max
    0 % 100 %

Waste

Waste type: Ammonium-containing residues from downstream abatement systems (e.g. scrubber liquors, spent filter media, deposits from flue-gas channels). Catalyst waste (where SCR units are installed downstream).

Specific waste generation reference: Baseline waste generation is determined by the performance and reagent demand of the existing SNCR system and the associated secondary residues produced by downstream abatement equipment. This reference will serve as the basis for comparative assessment during the planned pilot installations. SCID enables a significant reduction in reagent (ammonia) consumption compared with conventional SNCR. (1) In tests where SCID achieved 25% higher NOₓ-reduction levels, ammonia consumption was 37.6% lower than with SNCR. (2) Based on the observed reaction behaviour and underlying kinetics, ammonia savings of 50–60% appear achievable when SCID is operated at NOₓ-reduction levels equivalent to SNCR—particularly in installations where SNCR is already close to its performance limits. These indications will be further validated in the upcoming pilot installations. Installation-specific mg/Nm³ values will be reported as part of the pilot results.

Economics

Reliable and validated cost data for SCID are not yet available, as long-term operational experience and pilot-scale installations are still pending. Nevertheless, a preliminary qualitative assessment can be made based on the system architecture, reagent requirements, and comparative analysis with established NOₓ-abatement techniques: (1) From a structural and process-integration perspective, SCID is expected to fall within a similar investment range as conventional SNCR systems, as it does not require catalyst modules, reactor vessels, or major modifications of the flue-gas line. (2) In terms of operational costs, the technique requires the use of an additive; however, this may be offset by the significantly reduced ammonia consumption indicated during full-scale mobile testing. (3) Compared with SCR systems, SCID is anticipated to avoid substantial OPEX drivers such as catalyst replacement, DeSOx reagent consumption and associated maintenance activities. These cost expectations are indicative and will be substantiated through detailed engineering and comprehensive techno-economic assessments as part of the upcoming pilot installations.